10

June

2022

Marchi, Jcases

NUXE vs HANUXE: are the trademarks confusingly similar?

In a decision rendered on May 25, 2022, EUIPO’s Opposition Division reaffirmed the relevance, for the purposes of establishing similarity between the signs, of the fact that the…

20

May

2022

Marchi, Jcases

Morellino di Scansano vs Morellone

The First Board of Appeal of EUIPO was recently called to rule on whether PDOs and PGIs consisting of a compound name should receive a protection that is not limited to the name…

6

May

2022

Jcases

Barbie vs Barrbee

The well-known toy house Mattel owner, among others, of the trademark Barbie, filed an opposition against all the products of the European Union trademark application n. 18333277…

14

April

2022

Jcases

Wonder Woman vs Wonder Mum

When the superpowers are not enough...

1

April

2022

Marchi, Jcases

The patronymic trademark in the wine sector

With the sentence no. 25/22 The Board of Appeal of IPTO ruled on appeal no. 7770 denying the coexistence of two patronymic trademarks, even though they differed from each other…

17

March

2022

Jcases

Shakira vs Shakera

The EUIPO’s Opposition Division rejected the application for the registration of the figurative mark SHAKERA filed in relation to the following products: candles in class 4,…

9

March

2022

Jcases

Puma vs Vitalis Ener Drink Evolution

Puma has successfully opposed the EUTM application concerning a feline device and the word element “VITALIS ENER DRINK EVOLUTION” filed in order to protect in class 32 “Energy…

2

March

2022

Jcases

Volkswagen vs European Flipper / Pinball Factory GmbH

The Second Board of Appeal of the EUIPO has recently issued a decision in the case Volkswagen vs. European Flipper / Pinball Factory GmbH.

23

February

2022

Jcases

Labello

On 12 December 2017 Ms. Maria Alexandra Canisius file a EUTM application for the figurative sign in classes 3, 16 and 25.